| |
Arrests of the Two
Moscow Pride Organisers

■
Evgenia Debryanskaya
is arrested by the OMON (above) and
Nikolai Alekseev suffered the same fate, but by the Moscow city police
(below)
Both photos
courtesy GayRussia.ru
and
©
Grani.Ru
 |
|
MOSCOW, January 29, 2007 (GayRussia.ru)
– Organisers of last year’s first-ever Moscow Gay Pride have today formally
taken their case of the ban by the authorities in the Russian capital of
both a parade and a “picket” to the European Court of Human Rights in
Strasbourg, France.
This follows the unsuccessful
appeals against the bans through the Russian court system, which are now
exhausted, as far as requirements of European Court’s jurisprudence
are concerned.
The organizers are considering appealing pride bans to
the Russian Supreme Court parallel to their European Court application
though it will not effect the consideration of the case in Strasbourg.
At the same time, Moscow Pride
organisers announced that this year’s Moscow Pride will definitely be going
ahead, and that an application for a parade will be made in accordance with
Russian law, two weeks before the event, scheduled for Sunday May 27, the
day in 1993 when homosexuality was decriminalised in Russia.
The 20-page application to the
European Court of Human Rights, drafted in English language, combines two
cases: one concerning the ban by Moscow authorities of the gay pride march
and the second concerning the banning of the alternative pride picket, both
scheduled for May 27, 2006.
In the application, the litigants
claim that in denying permission to stage both the march and the picket the
Russian Federation breached Article 11 (right to freedom of peaceful
assembly), Article 13 (right to effective court protection) and Article 14
(discrimination ban) in conjunction with Article 11 of the European
Convention on Human Rights, to which Russia is a signatory.
The application sent to Strasbourg
today fully explains the legal position of the organisers of the gay pride,
and proves that the decisions of Russian authorities to ban the march and
the picket contradict both with Russian legislation and the European
Convention.
It also describes turbulent events
in the centre of Moscow which took place on May 27 last year when the
protestors attacked pride participants while police looked the other way.
Also specifically mentioned are illegal actions of Moscow police to detain
peaceful participants of gay events.
Organisers of Moscow Pride give a
whole range of evidence that suggests the real reasons behind the ban of the
march and picket were in the personal dislike by the mayor of Moscow of the
aims of these events.
The application cites a number of
statements by mayor Yuri Luzhkov made before and after May 27, which prove
the discriminatory nature of the banning of both the march and picket.
The document to the Court contains
29 attachments which give light to the events around the first ever gay
pride in the Russian capital.
| |

■ German MP Volker Beck, who was
injured during Moscow Pride last year. A still from the
documentary
“Mockba Pride ‘06” to
be premiered at Berlinale..
Courtesy GayRussia.ru |
|
Organisers of the Pride ask the
European Court to judge that Russian Federation breached their rights,
guaranteed by the European Convention, and that it has to pay 20,000 euros
(£13,000 or $US26,000) in compensation.
Nikolai Alekseev, one of the
organisers of Moscow Pride, said today that the application was very
important as it underpins the future of the whole LGBT community in Russia.
“It is about the future, in which
the rights of homosexual people will be acknowledged and respected and where
they will not be second class citizens without fundamental rights – and
unable to fight for our rights and dignity in our courts.”
He admitted that there was no way
of predicting when the European Court will consider the application.
“Not a single European legal expert
we have spoken with doubts in the success of our application to the Court,”
he said.
“Trying to silence us, the Russian
authorities denied us one of the fundamental human rights. The European
justice will have the last say in this case. After that not a single
official, including the Moscow Mayor, will be able to deprive us of our
legal right to freedom of public expression.”
Mr. Alekseev paid tribute to the
legal assistance the gay pride organisers had received while preparing the
application.
“I must pay my deepest respect to
our attorney Dmitri Bartenev, who in many cases was not in the news but who
did a colossal work on this very case. I must also thank a lot professor
Robert Wintemute from King’s College London, whose expert help was so
valuable and played a very important role,” he said.
Moscow Mayor Yuri Luzhkov was
officially notified by the organisers of the planned march last year on May
15, in accordance with Russian federal law.
Three days later, the Moscow city
authorities denied permission for the event due to what they claimed was the
“impossibility to provide adequate security”. However, it was no secret that
a gay pride – and a march – was being organised. Mayor Luzhkov even
commented on it at a press conference in Berlin last February, publicly
vowing that
he would not permit the march to go ahead. Mr.
Luzhkov’s statements in Berlin are also quoted in the application to the
European Court
The march was supposed to take
place on Saturday May 27 as part of the first-ever Moscow Pride. The
planned route was along Myasnitskaya Street in Moscow to Lubyanskaya Square
– and up to 2,000 participants were expected to take part.
The day before the planned Pride
march, the Tverskoi district court of Moscow confirmed the legality of the
ban by Moscow authorities and on September 19 the Moscow City Court
confirmed the decision of the ‘first instance court’.
Then, on December 25, the Moscow
City Court denied an application to review the ban “in extraordinary
procedure of the court’s Presidium”.
After the organizers of Moscow
Pride received a letter of denial to stage the march, they notified the
Prefecture of the Central Administrative District of Moscow on May 23 that
they would be staging a “picket” in Lubyanskaya Square as an alternative to
the march.
Giving the same reason as Moscow
City Hall for not allowing the march – that it would be impossible to
provide security of the event, the Prefecture banned the picket.
This decision was also appealed
through the Russian court system with the same result as the appeals on the
march.
Mr. Alekseev said that he was
hopeful that the application for this year’s march will be successful.
“The uniqueness of the situation
this year will be in the fact that not a single member-state of the Council
of Europe experienced two applications in a row to the European Court on the
issue of gay pride marches bans”.
“The application to the European
Court by the Warsaw gay pride organizers on the ban of their march in 2005,
though still being considered in Strasbourg, helped to get a permission of
the similar march last year,” he pointed out.
Mr. Alekseev added that if a ban is
placed on this year’s march, “we will again take the case to the European
Court”.
“State authorities should respect
the laws,” he said. “That is what the authorities also expect from all of
us. Under the Russian constitution and legislation everyone has the right to
peaceful marches and other public events.
“The authorities are obliged to
guarantee the recognition of this right and provide the security of its
participants.”
■ The events of first Moscow gay
pride are the subject of a documentary film by Vladimir Ivanov, “MOCKBA.
PRIDE ‘06”. The world premiere is scheduled to take place on February 11 at
the Berlin Film Festival with subsequent screenings on February 14 and 15.
SEE ALSO
Moscow
Mayor: Gay Pride is ‘Satanist Happening’. The Mayor of
Moscow has this afternoon dubbed his city’s gay pride parade as being a
“Satanist happening”. (UK Gay News, January 29, 2007)
■ Read
Peter Tatchell's "on the spot" report of
Moscow Pride (UK Gay News, May 27, 2006)
LINKS
| |
|
|
|
 |
|
website |
| |
|
|
|
 |
|
website |
| |
|
|
|
Posted: 29 January 2007 at
08:00 (UK time) |