HOMEARCHIVEEMAIL US | TRAVEL SECTION
 

 

UNITED KINGDOM

More Controversy at Manchester Gay Pride as Business Group Speaks Out Against Commercialisation

What we now have is Marketing Manchester’s Pride”
 

 

LANGUAGE OPTIONS

This article in only available in English. For online instant translation in selected other languages, see below.

 

 

 

 

MANCHESTER, August 30, 2008  –  The row over the ‘commercialisation’ of Manchester Gay Pride deepened yesterday when the chair of the Village Business Association (VBA) hit out at the ‘establishment’, saying that Gay Pride in the city had lost its direction.

The VBA is listed on the Manchester Pride Website as a “partner”.

Effectively agreeing with the Gay Youth Network’s protests at the Pride Parade last Saturday, Phil Burke, who heads the VBA, said: “What we now have is Marketing Manchester’s Pride”.

In a statement, first revealed in yesterday’s Manchester Evening News, Mr. Burke said that the “general feeling amongst the businesses, and a vast number of attendees, is that we no longer have a Manchester Pride that is an annual celebration of the LGBT community and The Gay Village”.

The strongly worded statement accused Pride organisers of being “dictators”, revelling “in the power that they wield”.

He revealed that businesses cannot advertise Pride or use the logo without paying a very sizeable donation.

Pointing out that Manchester Pride was created as a celebration of being gay, Mr. Burke continued:

“Let’s make no mistake that Manchester Pride is a hugely successful event, and long may that continue.  But maybe its time to stop trying to turn it into a Reading Festival, the V Festival or a mini Glastonbury.”

UK Gay News has made every effort to contact Manchester Pride for comment during the day, but the only telephone number listed on their press releases has not been answered – and their has not been a reply to an email.  Any statement this is forthcoming will be published here.

But yesterday, Jacquie Crozier, the festival director of Manchester Pride, told the Manchester Evening News: Many of the businesses in the village have already told us how happy they are with this years event.  We consult with the Village Business Association early in the planning process and we look forward to continuing that healthy dialogue.

However, many businesses in the Village have come out in support of Mr. Burke’s statement.

“My concern is that the corporate face of it all has taken over at the expense of the gay people and organisations it was created to celebrate,” said one spokesperson for a bar in the Village.

“The Youth Group are up in arms apparently, gay businesses sidelined, people were refused entry to The Vigil to mourn and celebrate the memories of their lost and loved ones because they hadn’t paid £18.”

Advance ticket prices for Manchester Pride this year were £18.50 for the entire weekend –£12.50 if purchased before July 14 – plus a booking fee.  A day ticket was £10, plus booking fee  The price went up at the time of the event to £20 for the entire weekend or £15 for one day. (in both cases there was no booking fee).

UK Gay News has received several complaints that people who wanted to attend the Candlelit Vigil in Sackville Gardens, the closing event of Pride which remembers those affected by HIV/Aids, were turned away as they had not purchased tickets.

“To exclude people from the vigil because they have not paid for a wristband should not be acceptable to anyone and, whether deliberate or not, there is an assumption by many people that they are excluded from their vigil, their opportunity to remember and celebrate the lives of their friends, lovers, family members, and others in the community,” said one member of a Manchester HIV/Aids support groups.

“HIV is not owned by any one individual or organisation.  Why is the HIV vigil no longer the HIV vigil?”
 

 

THE FULL STATEMENT BY PHIL BURKE

As the Chair of Manchester Village Business Association, I wanted to write this letter a while ago, after a very long time of consideration and frustration, but decided to let sleeping dogs lie.

However, I have now been asked and urged to write it by so many people that I have been left with no choice.  It is with no pleasure or hidden agenda that I do so.

The subject matter is unfortunately Manchester Pride, or rather the organisation and running of Manchester Pride.  A number of the businesses have requested, no demanded, that this debate is opened and resolved.

The general feeling amongst the businesses, and a vast number of attendees, is that we no longer have a Manchester Pride that is an annual celebration of the LGBT community and The Gay Village.  What we now have is Marketing Manchester’s Pride!

It has become an annual excuse for the organisation behind Pride to become dictators and revel in the power that they wield.  Businesses are held to ransom over contributions, accreditations become more cumbersome and complicated, legally granted licences are revoked, little or no input is asked for, or actually wanted, from the very businesses that are the life blood of the whole event, and the VBA is at best tolerated and apparently seen more of a hindrance.

You would think that a charity-driven event would actively encourage and search for advertising opportunities; the more people that know and are interested in an event then the more people attend and buy wristbands.

This alas is not the case with Pride.  Businesses are actually dictated to that they cannot advertise Pride or use the logo before paying a very sizeable donation to them.  You will not be listed or appear anywhere on the website either.

As we all know, and are extremely grateful for, The Village has a number of independent and small operators.  It is these very independent and usually flamboyant people who keep The Gay Village fresh and alive 365 days a year.

Yet these are the very businesses that are penalised and punished by Pride for not having the ready cash-flow of a large multi national operator, who can pay up their branch’s contribution easily.  Small businesses sometimes rely on the Big Weekend itself to fund their contribution, so therefore get absolutely no support, no listings, no encouragement and no help from Pride because they haven’t paid up.

Surely an organisation that is in existence purely because of the businesses that started the whole thing off would want to support those businesses. Again this is not the case.  What could and should be a community driven event is now a purely commercial operation, with absolutely no regard or thought given to the community itself.  Established Gay Village operators are shunned and overlooked for non entity, non gay organisations that just have bigger purses.

One of our established operators wanted to add a fairground ride into the site, at their own expense and in a location of Prides choice, an idea that the VBA fully and vocally supported, and yet was refused.

Obviously because Pride needed yet another food concession on every available spare metre.  One of the residents on Bloom Street was actually refused entry to their own owned property because two passes had already been issued (to the lodgers in his spare room by the way), so he bought a pass rather than deal with the rude ‘jobsworths’ at accreditation.

The VIP tent was blatantly only there for Marketing Manchester to entertain their clients and friends, as none of the businesses got any passes!  One of The Gay Villages most prominent and well known personalities was physically attacked by the Pride security back stage, as he was about to go on, for free, on his own time.  This person has been involved with Manchester Pride since day one, and has been very instrumental in helping to create the very village we see today.  Yet apparently, in the new order of ‘pounds over poofs’, this means nothing.

And the tales and stories go on and on, each detailing how the corporate face and commerciality of Pride is blatantly and forcibly enforced over and above the community and its participants.

Let’s make no mistake that Manchester Pride is a hugely successful event, and long may that continue.  But maybe its time to stop trying to turn it into a Reading Festival, the V Festival or a mini Glastonbury.

This event was created as a celebration of being gay, a chance for the gay community to revel and wallow in the fact that we do indeed have a famous Gay Village and a thriving huge and loyal base.  The event is very important….the philosophy and ethos behind it is far more so!

As the spokesman for the VBA it is my job to ensure that the businesses are heard, and the feeling now is actually so strong that we demand to be heard and we demand an open, transparent and fair debate on where we go from here. Without the businesses there is no Pride, so I now publicly and openly challenge them to join us in this debate and help us all ensure that Manchester Pride enjoys and celebrates another 18 years.
Phil Burke

 

 

 

 



Seed Newsvine  


Add to Mixx!

Got an opinion on this article?  Leave your comment here.

  Weblog Commenting and Trackback by HaloScan.com


How to contact UK Gay News
Email:
editorial(at)ukgaynews.org.uk  
Phone
0789 999 5439 (UK)
+44 789 999 5439 (international)
 

AIM messenger:  UKGayNews; 
Skype messenger:  ukgaynews

 

     

SEE ALSO

Gay Youth Defy Manchester Pride With ‘Pride Not Profit’ Placards.  A small group of gay youngsters incurred the wrath of Manchester Gay Pride Festival organisers with a number of placards and t-shirts that read Pride Before Profit and Pride Is a Protest.  Minutes before the march moved off from Liverpool Street, Festival director Jackie Crozier went up to David Henry of the Queer Youth Network....  (UK Gay News, August 23, 2008)

Manchester Gay Pride in PicturesThirty photographs from yesterday's event, the 18th Pride in the city.  (UK Gay News, August 23, 2008)

Pride Festival 'Just About Money'.  By Don Frame.  Manchester's Pride festival has been accused of betraying its gay and lesbian roots by a leading Gay Village businessman.  (Manchester Evening News, August 29, 2008)

Manchester Pride a "Purely Commercial Operation" Claims Gay Business Leader.  A leading member of Manchester's gay village has attacked the organisation and running of the city's Pride events.  (Pink News, August 29, 2008)

 

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Licence.  

Posted: 30 August 2008 at 18:00 (UK time)

   
             
       

Fasthosts powered web hosting