EDINBURGH, February 29, 2008 – In
what will be seen as refreshing news for the internet community, a ‘cyber
squatter’ has not only relinquished a domain name he has been sitting on for
four years, but has also been refused payment of the $12,000 fee he was
demanding for it by the official escrow-holding intermediaries.
Edinburgh-based Fitlads.net, a
successful gay dating site with over 200,000 members, is the second largest
gay website in the UK, and has spent over 4 years trying to obtain the
domain fitlads.com.
Like many companies, Fitlads found
to their dismay that an individual had registered the domain name with
intent to profit from the goodwill of the trademark belonging to fitlads.net
– known as ‘cyber squatting’.
The cyber squatter then offered to
sell fitlads.com to fitlads.net, owners of the original trademark contained
within the name, at a vastly over-inflated price.
However, the official escrow
holders of the fee paid into a safe account by Fitlads.net didn’t receive
adequate proof from the cyber squatter that they actually owned the title.
They subsequently refused to authorise payment, returning the £6,000 they
held on Fitlads.net’s behalf back to the company.
When Fitlads.net contacted the
‘squatter’ to seek further clarification regarding transfer of the name, the
‘squatter’ suddenly decided to simply transfer the domain name to Fitlads.
"Please be advised that from time
to time, Internet REIT Inc acquires domain names through portfolio
acquisitions,” the ‘squatter said.
“We do not target any particular
domain names nor seek to interfere or infringe on any third-party rights.
It is our policy to transfer a domain name to any person that, in our
reasonable opinion, has a legitimate claim to that domain. Based upon the
information provided to us, we have voluntarily transferred the subject
domain name to a new account with our registrar free of charge to you.”
Describing cyber squatters as “one
of the scourges of the world wide web, Joseph Hill, a director of
Fitlads.net, was overjoyed.
“[Cyber squatters] constantly seek
to profit from something they have no right to, swapping and trading large
portfolios of domain names between them,” he said.
“We were originally being asked for
£30,000 to purchase the fitlads.com domain name from them. However, we
initiated our purchase through official channels, and the escrow agent we
used for security purposes quickly established that the squatter appeared to
have no proof that they actually owned the domain name they were trying to
re-sell us.
“This outcome has to be welcomed by
businesses with unique or trademarked domain names, and my message to anyone
contemplating striking back at these opportunists is to research carefully
and engage professional intermediaries before even contemplating the handing
over of any cash.”
LINK
 |
|
website |
This work is licensed under a
Creative Commons Licence.
|
Posted: 29 February 2008 at
17:30 (UK time) |