|
|
|||||
|
USA |
|||||
|
|
Commentary
Respect for Jarred Gamwell Who Lost, | ||||
|
|
|
||||
|
Have your say! You have the option of "signing up" to the forum or to post views as a "guest" While "free speech" is encouraged, please bear in mind libel etc. Any posts deemed libellous under the laws of England and Wales will be removed. Also, offensive posts will be removed.
|
And as anyone running for any election knows, you have to have a slogan or two for your campaign. Jarred opted for “Queer Eye for Hunt High” and “Gay Guys Know Everything”. Posters were duly made and pinned up around the school – as were others for the three other candidates. But head teacher Bill Williamson ordered Jarrad’s poster to be removed – they were “disruptive”, he claimed. The American Civil Liberties Union then became involved and the matter went to court. Suddenly, Jarred Gamwell became a name that was flashed around the world by news agencies. He was a “celebrity”. The court case was lost. On the eve of the election ballot, Judge Dwight Cranford ruled from the Wilson County courthouse that the school was right to remove the posters. The following day, Jarred “lost” the election, coming fourth. Jarred’s mobile phone was constantly ringing. The media was interested. He was soon fielding calls from network television – CBS’s “Good Morning America” and NBC’s “The Today Show”, to name just two. As several American newspapers observed, even adults running for office seek this sort of attention. But Jarred did not – he just wanted his campaign posters displayed and sought the help of the ACLU. As for the publicity, Jarred has said that he certainly has more respect from his peers at school than before. And he has the utmost respect from this website. The same sort of respect as Chris Morris has had for years in the United Kingdom. Chris, when he was 16, decided that he and other British gay teens that were discriminated against when it came to the age of consent which then was 18 for gays, yet 16 for heterosexuals. The matter ended up in the European Court of Human Rights. But the case was never heard as the British Government, convinced that the court would rule in favour of Chris, settled “out of court” and agreed to bring in legislation to equalise the age of consent at 16. While Jarred was unsuccessful, he fearlessly “had a go”, trying to put right a wrong. But in many ways, he did win. 2 May, 2004
|
|
| HOME | LATEST NEWS | CONTACT |