The comprehensive resource for vacations and hotels marketed to the LGBT community








 

 

 

 


 

 

 

UK

Government ‘Choosing Health’ Funding Not Reaching Sexual Health Services

 


 

   



 

 

LONDON, August 2, 2006  –  A substantial portion of the £300 million funding earmarked for sexual health that accompanied the Choosing Health White Paper is not reaching front-line sexual health services, even though the Government has identified sexual health and GUM as a top six priority for the NHS in the current year, a survey published today (August 2) has found.

The survey was undertaken by the Independent Advisory Group on Sexual Health and HIV (IAG) and covered all aspects of sexual health, including services for gay men.

Many Primary Care Trusts (PCTs) and Strategic Health Authorities (SHAs) have withheld all or part of the Choosing Health funding to cover deficits within the PCT or the wider local health economy.

Initial results indicate that funding is reaching front-line services in only 30 out of the 191 PCTs surveyed.

The results, IAG says, represent a ‘snapshot’ of how funding is allocated, and the situation is changing all the time.  Indications were received from almost two out of three PCTs (191 PCTs responded out of 304).

Baroness Gould, Chair of the Independent Advisory Group on Sexual Health and HIV commented; “The IAG believes that it is essential that SHAs and PCTs recognise that investment now in front-line sexual health services will save them a great deal of money in the future,” said Baroness Gould, chair of the Independent Advisory Group on Sexual Health and HIV.

“Better sexual health services bring benefits for patients as well as delivering cost savings for the NHS by reducing the number of STIs and unwanted pregnancies.

“PCTs and SHAs allocate their own budgets as they see appropriate, and many PCTs are facing difficult financial circumstances at the moment,” she pointed out.

“Reports coming back to us indicate that sexual health services are still facing difficulties in many areas, with all that is associated with poor funding such as recruitment freezes, clinics closing, and cutting services in areas like contraception, not to mention lowering morale among staff.

“Sexual health has been designated a top six Government priority and the Department of Health is making efforts to ensure targets are met.  The funding that accompanied Choosing Health was meant to help PCTs bolster services at a time when STI rates are increasing, yet according to the response that we have received from those ‘on the ground’, this is not happening in the way we had expected. 

“We firmly believe that modernising sexual health services in a holistic way is the best way to deliver the 48 hour access target for GUM, and meet other sexual health needs.”

Commenting on the report, Nick Partridge, chief executive of the gay men’s health charity Terrence Higgins Trust said:  “Local health services managers are going to have to be extremely innovative if they’re going to make the necessary improvements to sexual health services without the help of the Choosing Health money.

“Front line services need thorough modernisation in order to begin to tackle rates of sexually transmitted infections.

“It would be a great disappointment if the nation’s sexual health were sacrificed on the altar of financial balance in the NHS,” he added.

The report finds that 51 PCTs had absorbed their entire Choosing Health allocation into the PCT budget, while 33 PCTs had withheld some of most of their allocation.

In specific areas of sexual health, 31 PCTs mentioned that funding for the Chlamydia screening programme has been withheld, thereby hampering the roll-out of the programme in those areas.

In GUM services, 40 PCTs indicated that services are being affected by withholding of Choosing Health allocations –  recruitment had been frozen, services understaffed, and lacking in adequate resources.

And 40 PCTs said that allocated funding has not reached contraceptive services.  There have also been a number of reports of services being cut, clinics closed and staff freezes.

Results were collated from a variety of sources including sexual health leads, clinicians (doctors and nurses) and PCT Chief Executives.  This includes spontaneous approaches to the IAG.

■  The Independent Advisory Group on Sexual Health and HIV was set up in 2003 to monitor progress of the National Strategy for Sexual Health and HIV and advise Government on implementation.  Experts from all fields of sexual health are members of the IAG.

 

 

Got an opinion on this article?  Leave your comment here.

  Weblog Commenting and Trackback by HaloScan.com

Posted: 2 August 2006 at 00:00 (UK time)

 

 

 

ARCHIVE LATEST NEWS CONTACT EMAIL