GENEVA, December 13 2006 – The
Joint United Nations Programme on HIV/AIDS and its cosponsors, WHO, UNFPA,
UNICEF and the World Bank, note with considerable interest today’s
announcement by the US National Institutes of Health that two trials
assessing the impact of male circumcision on HIV risk are being stopped on
the recommendation of the NIH Data Safety and Monitoring Board (DSMB).
The two trials involving 8,000 men,
funded by the US National Institutes of Health, were carried out in Kisumu,
Kenya, among men aged 18-24 years and in Rakai, Uganda, among men aged 15-49
years.
The trials, which completed
enrolment of patients in 2005, were stopped by the DSMB evaluating the
results of interim analyses. The role of the DSMB is to assess progress of
the trials and recommend whether to continue, modify or terminate them.
Although no detailed results have
been released at this time, the National Institutes of Health statement
makes it clear that the studies are being stopped because they revealed an
approximate halving of risk of HIV infection in men who were circumcised.
The results support the findings of
the South Africa Orange Farm Intervention Trial, funded by the French Agence
Nationale de Recherches sur le SIDA (ANRS) and published in late 2005, which
demonstrated at least a 60% reduction in HIV infection among circumcised
men.
A further trial to assess the
impact of male circumcision on the risk of HIV transmission to female
partners from HIV-infected men, led by researchers at Johns Hopkins
University, is currently under way in Uganda, with results expected in 2008.
The effect of male circumcision on
reducing the risk of HIV transmission among men who have sex with men has
not been studied in a randomized controlled trial.
WHO and the UNAIDS Secretariat will
rapidly convene a consultation to examine the results of these trials to
date and their implications for countries, particularly those in sub-Saharan
Africa and elsewhere with high HIV prevalence and low male circumcision
levels.
Although these results demonstrate
that male circumcision reduces the risk of men becoming infected with HIV,
the UN agencies emphasize that it does not provide complete protection
against HIV infection.
Circumcised men can still become
infected with the virus and, if HIV-positive, can infect their sexual
partners.
Male circumcision should never
replace other known effective prevention methods and should always be
considered as part of a comprehensive prevention package, which includes
correct and consistent use of male or female condoms, reduction in the
number of sexual partners, delaying the onset of sexual relations, and HIV
testing and counselling, the UN group points out.
It is anticipated that news of
these results will heighten interest in male circumcision from governments,
non-governmental institutions, and the general public in a number of
countries, in addition to increasing demand for male circumcision services.
WHO, the UNAIDS Secretariat and their partners will review the detailed
trial findings and will then define specific policy recommendations for
expanding and/or promoting male circumcision. These policy recommendations
will need to take into account:
■ cultural and human rights
considerations associated with promoting circumcision;
■ the risk of complications from
the procedure performed in various settings;
■ the potential to undermine
existing protective behaviours and prevention strategies that reduce the
risk of HIV infection; and
■ the observation that the ideal
and well-resourced conditions of a randomized trial are often not
replicated in other service delivery settings.
Countries or health care
institutions which decide to offer male circumcision more widely as an
additional way to protect against HIV infection must ensure that it is
performed safely by well-trained practitioners in sanitary settings under
conditions of informed consent, confidentiality, risk reduction counselling
and safety.
These countries or institutions
must also ensure that male circumcision is promoted and delivered in a
culturally appropriate manner and that sufficient and correct information on
the continuing need for other HIV prevention measures is provided.
This will be necessary to prevent
people from developing a false sense of security and, as a result, engaging
in high risk behaviours which could negate the protective effect of male
circumcision.
In order to support countries or
institutions that decide to scale up male circumcision services, WHO, the
UNAIDS Secretariat and their partners are developing:
■ Technical guidance on ethical,
rights-based, clinical and programmatic approaches to male circumcision
■ Rapid assessment toolkits for
a) determining circumcision prevalence, determining acceptability,
identifying key providers, and estimating costs and b) monitoring numbers
of circumcisions performed, their safety, and their potential impact on
sexual behaviour
■ Guidance on training, standard
setting, certification, and accreditation.
WHO, UNFPA, UNICEF, the World Bank,
the UNAIDS Secretariat and their partners will continue to work together to
support governments and other development partners and to provide
coordinated, consistent and up-to-date guidance for service delivery,
including for the monitoring and evaluation of services and follow-up of men
who have been circumcised. These groups will also work cooperatively to
identify the best means of increasing the delivery of safe circumcision
services in countries that choose to do so.
LINK
World Health Organisation HIV/Aids website