Michael Cashman stood in the European Parliament today and reminded his
colleagues: “I am gay – I’m homosexual”.
The
British MEP, who is president of the Parliament’s “intergroup” on gay and
lesbian matters, was speaking during the debate on homophobia in the
European Union. And referring to the Commission’s report presented earlier,
he expressed disappointment.
He
insisted that the debate was not about promoting homosexuality, adding that
it was about the basic human rights of gay men and women in the EU.
“It’s
a day of great sadness that I have to make this statement to Parliament,” he
said at the conclusion of his allowed two-and-a-half minute speech.
He
and other MEPs were responding to a Commission statement made to Parliament
by Franco Frattini, the commissioner for justice, freedom and security. And
there was a sense of frustration from many of the speeches.
Mr.
Frattini told Parliament that the European Community had powers under
Article 13 of the Treaty to combat all forms of discrimination, including
discrimination on grounds of sexuality.
| |

■
Franco Frattini, European Commissioner
(photo: European Commission) |
|
He
said that this discrimination is “expressly forbidden” and that the European Commission
will continue to “fight against homophobia and discrimination based on
sexual orientation”.
“I
absolutely condemn homophobia,” he told MEPs, without putting forward any
remedies.
First
to respond to Mr. Frattini was Alexander Stubb (European People’s Party,
Finland) who said that “it is key to get members states to abide by Article
13”.
He
even went so far as to suggest members should not only have regard to
homophobia in the EU, but also look outside Europe where there were nine
countries who had the death penalty for the crime of being homosexual.
Sophia in 't Veld (Alliance of Liberals and Democrats, the Netherlands)
pointed out that the problems with Gay Pride events in some countries last
year were “a scandal and a disgrace”.
For
the Greens, Kathalijne Buitenweg, also from the Netherlands, asked exactly
what the Commission has being doing about the problem.
And
she cited Poland, where there had been big demonstrations to “prevent
homosexual emancipation”.
Konrad Szymanski (Union
for Europe of the Nations, Poland) pointed out that he felt the debate “was
a waste of time”.
Replying to the debate, a visibly annoyed Mr. Frattini said that when it
came to homophobia, there were absolute rights. However, he pointed out
that the European Commission does not have the powers to combat homophobia
in member countries.
But,
he added, a proposal to empower an agency “was on the table”.
While
Mr. Frattini looked annoyed, during his response to the debate television
cameras panned around MEPs who looked both shocked and frustrated, with Mr.
Cashman sporting a wry smile as he shook his head in disbelief.
Before the debate, UK Green Party MEP Jean Lambert (London) urged the EU to
reassert its commitment to anti-discrimination during a debate on a common
resolution to tackle homophobia across Europe.
“Many EU Governments are failing to fully adhere to anti-discrimination
legislation and its time that this changed,” she said.
“This is an important moment for the EU to reassert its commitment to
anti-discrimination. and ensure that everyone is given the rights they
deserve.
“Everyone is equal regardless of their sexuality, gender or race. If we are
serious about justice then we need to ensure Europe does not see homophobic
acts as acceptable,” insisted Ms. Lambert, Parliament’s intergroup on gay
and lesbian rights.
“We have seen that some politicians and EU countries are willing to express
homophobic views which is extremely worrying for all.
“There is absolutely no excuse for a modern Europe to make allowance’s for
those countries allowing discrimination and homophobic behavior and we need
to take a stand against this now,” she concluded.
A
commentary on the debate by Ms Joke Swiebel, the former Dutch MEP and former
president of Parliament's intergroup on gay and lesbian rights.
■
Note. The quotations from the speeches in Parliament above are those given
by the contemporaneous translations. The full official English transcript
of the debate should be available on Tuesday January 17.