| |

■ President
Vaira Vīķe-Freiberga:
“Departure from any of the principles of democracy destroys democracy
itself.” |
|
RIGA, July 20, 2006 – The
President of Latvia and Amnesty International (AI) have both issued
statements this morning following yesterday’s decision by the Riga City
Council to ban this weekend’s planned Gay Pride march in the capital.
Apparently responding to
yesterday’s decision, President Vaira Vīķe-Freiberga, issued a very strong
statement defending the civil and human rights of all citizens of Latvia.
While not actually naming the
event, she says: “Departure from any of the principles of democracy destroys
democracy itself.”
The Presidential statement, issued
in Latvian late yesterday, was posted on her official website this morning
in English.
“[The] Constitution guarantees to
the residents of Latvia the right to the freedom of speech and assembly,
which means guarantees of free expression of one’s views,” President
Vīķe-Freiberga says.
She points out that Latvia is a
democratic state and that society must respect different views and the
rights of different people, including the rights of individuals with a
different sexual orientation.
“Everyone is entitled to have an
opinion on that or other matter; however imposing of one’s opinion must not
restrict the rights of other people,” the President writes.
[Click here for the full text of
the Presidential statement]
In London, Amnesty International
said it was “is highly concerned and disappointed” at this latest
development in Latvia’s inability to protect the rights of the lesbian, gay,
bisexual and transgender (LGBT) community.
“Amnesty International calls on the
Latvian authorities to respect the right of its LGBT community to freedom of
assembly and expression and to permit the “Riga Pride 2006”march to take
place on 22 July 2006.
“Amnesty International would like
to remind the Latvian authorities of their obligations under international
law with regards to the right to freedom of assembly and the rights to
freedom of expression.
“The rights to peaceful assembly is
recognized and protected by Article 21 of the International Covenant on
Civil and Political Rights (ICCPR) and article 11 of the European Convention
for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms (ECHR), while
article 21 of the ICCPR and article 10 of the ECHR protect the rights to
freedom of expression. Latvia is a State Party to both the ICCPR and the
ECHR,” AI points out.
“The claims of Riga City Council
that security would not be able to be guaranteed to the participants of the
march lacks credibility considering that Latvian law enforcement agencies
had the capacity to effectively ensure security during previous events of a
similar or larger scale such as the 2006 ice hockey World Championships, and
are expected to so during the November 2006 NATO summit in Riga.
“The refusal to grant permission
for the “Riga Pride 2006” may thus constitute a breach of Latvia’s
international obligations under, inter alia, Article 2 of the ICCPR, Article
14 of the ECHR and Article 21 of the EU Charter of Fundamental Rights to
prohibit discrimination,” the statement points out..
Amnesty International calls on:
■ The Riga
City Council to give permission for the “Riga Pride 2006” march to go ahead.
■ The Latvian
authorities to ensure, in accordance with its positive obligations under
international human rights law, that the “Riga Pride 2006” demonstrators are
properly protected in a manner which allows them to exercise their rights to
freedom of assembly and expression.
■ Latvian law
enforcement agencies to act under all circumstances with due diligence to
protect LGBT people against violence from the wider community. The
authorities should also make clear that such violence is a criminal offence
and will be prosecuted as such.
■ The Finnish
EU Presidency and the EU Commission to take active steps to promote
fundamental rights and non-discrimination in Latvia and in particular to
support the right to freedom of assembly, including the “Riga Pride 2006”
and similar events in all EU member states.
[Click
here for the full text of Amnesty International’s statement]
Mozaīka, the group co-ordinating
Riga Friendship Days and Gay Pride March, has today submitted a petition to
the Riga District Administrative Court to overturn the city council’s
decision. The Administrative Court will announce its ruling tomorrow,
Friday, July 21.
“We are shocked by the city
council’s decision, which we view as not only an unacceptable restriction of
the freedom of assembly, but a major blow to democracy in the face of
terrorist threats,” said Mozaîka board member Linda Freimane.
“We have prepared a challenge to
the decision in the Administrative Court today. Last year the
Administrative Court acted very correctly by overturning the city council’s
decision to revoke the Pride march permit, and so we are very hopeful that
this year, too, the Court will defend democratic rights in Latvia by
overturning the council’s decision.”
Before leaving London for Latvia
this morning, gay
human rights activist Peter Tatchell of Outrage! said that Riga Gay Pride is a litmus test of
Latvia democracy.
“This ban fits a pattern of homophobia by the Latvian
authorities,” he said.
“It is scandalous that a member state of the EU is
giving in to threats and blackmail by religious fundamentalists and the far
right.
“The government of Latvia has a duty to resist threats
of homophobic violence, protect its gay citizens and safeguard the right to
peaceful protest.
“The Latvian parliament recently refused to pass a law
prohibiting employment discrimination against lesbians and gays, even though
as a member state of the EU it is required to outlaw workplace
discrimination based on sexual orientation. Latvia has also banned same-sex
marriage,” Mr Tatchell concluded.
LINKS

OTHER RIGA PRIDE COVERAGE
Neo-Nazis Terrorise Riga Gay Pride Rally.
By Peter Tatchell. Neo-Nazi, Christian fundamentalist and extreme
nationalist protesters terrorised participants at the Gay Pride rally in the
Latvian capital of Riga last Saturday (July 22, 2006). Private armed guards
were drafted in to provide security, after the Latvian police repeatedly
failed to halt the aggression of the homophobic mob.
(UK
Gay News, July 22, 2006)
Riga Gay
Pride: Lars Grava - “The Story That Needs To Be Told”.
Open Letter From Lars Grava.
Dearest friends: I am writing this in English since the story needs to be
told far and wide. This is the story from my perspective. Everyone else who
was there will have other stories to share. Gaston and I are safe after yesterday's well-organized
fascist attacks against the lesbian, gay, bisexual and transgendered
community in Riga during Pride.
(UK
Gay News, July 22, 2006)
Gay Pride Organisers "Trapped" in Riga Hotel
– Rescued by Cabinet Minister
Organisers of Riga Gay Pride
have been "rescued" after being trapped for hours in the in the Reval Latvia Hotel, with "hysterical"
protesters surrounding the building. (UK
Gay News, July 22, 2006)
Riga Gay Pride: Putting the European Union to the Test.
Commentary.
Sophie In’t Veld, the Dutch MEP and a vice president of
the European Parliament’s Intergroup for gay and lesbian rights did not
mince her words. “It’s putting Europe to the test,” she charged.
(UK
Gay News, July 22, 2006)
Prohibiting Gay Rights March Is Blow for
Democracy.
Commentary by
Mozaīka. ...
Democracy is being held hostage by the
strengthening forces of extremism in Latvian society. These forces have
been encouraged by the unwillingness of the political elite to rein them in,
and indeed by the continuous barrage of hate speech indulged in with
impunity by many politicians themselves.
(UK
Gay News, July 22, 2006)
Riga Gay Pride: It's Worse Than Moscow.
By Nikolai Alexeyev. It is astonishing. It’s worse than Moscow.
There is total chaos here. The police seem very weak and disorganized. The
fascists are able to act at will. And Latvia is in the European Union.
(UK
Gay News, July 22, 2006)
Citing National Security,
Court Says No To Riga Gay Pride. The
Administrative Court in Riga has this afternoon upheld the decision of the
City authorities to ban the Gay Pride Parade, due to be held tomorrow, on
the grounds of “national security” and concerns over public order. (UK
Gay News, July 21, 2006)
Riga Gay Pride: We Will
Not Organise Any Illegal Event. As the decision of the
Administrative Court as to whether or not tomorrow’s Gay Pride March in Riga
can go ahead, organisers said today that “regardless of the outcome, we will
not organise any illegal event”.
(UK
Gay News, July 21, 2006)
Riga Gay Pride March Ban
Is Wrong Says, Euro-MP Cashman. Labour MEP Michael Cashman has reacted with anger at the decision by authorities in
Latvia to ban this year’s Pride march which was scheduled for this Saturday
(22nd July).
(UK
Gay News, July 20, 2006)
A Blow for Democracy: Riga
Council Denies Permit for Gay Pride March. The Riga city council
this morning denied a permit Saturday’s “Riga Pride 2006” march. The city council justified its
decision by invoking threats of violence allegedly received from extremist
groups – and the police’s inability to guarantee security and order during
the march. (UK Gay News, July 19, 2006)
Latvian Priest Strongly
Supports Riga Gay Pride. An
English translation of an interview with openly gay Maris Sants conducted by
GayRussia website.
(UK Gay News, July 17, 2006)
Tension and Uncertainty
Rising Around Second Gay Pride in Riga. Latvian interior minister Dzintars Jaundžeikars went on record last week that the
Interior Ministry would not be able to provide adequate security during this
year’s Pride March, scheduled to be held on Saturday (July 22).
(UK Gay News, July 16, 2006)
Prominent Foreign Politicians to Take Part in Riga Pride.
Several European
politicians will be taking part in Friendship Days and Riga Gay Pride, due
to take place in the Latvian capital next week. (UK Gay News, July 16,
2006)