LONDON, July 25, 2006 – The Liberal Democrats, Pride
London and Amnesty International have all hit out at the events in Riga on
Saturday when the banned Gay Pride march was moved into an indoor event to
comply with a court judgement.
Baroness Sarah Ludford, MEP, the Liberal Democrat
spokeswoman on European justice and a Member of the European Parliament’s
‘Intergroup’ on gay and lesbian rights described the situation in Riga as
“pure homophobia”.
Emma Hands, vice chair of Pride London, said that the
failure of the police to protect those taking part in Riga Pride was
“shameful”, while Amnesty International demanded that the police and
judicial authorities should in future “act with due diligence” to protect
LGBT people against violence from the wider community.
In a statement, Baroness Ludford said: “This is pure
homophobia and a deplorable violation of the rights of lesbian, gay,
bisexual and transgender people.
“European human rights law obliges Latvia to respect the
right to freedom of assembly and expression, she continued. “Thus the Riga
authorities must take active measures to protect march participants.
“This unacceptable discrimination against gay people in
parts of ‘new Europe’ must be speedily ended.
“The European Commission should instigate action against
Latvia for failing to respect EU laws on freedom, dignity and equal rights
for all citizens,” she insisted. “European laws must also be strengthened
to include measures for combating homophobic hate crime.”
In January, MEPs voted overwhelmingly to condemn
discrimination on the basis of sexual orientation in their resolution
‘Homophobia in Europe’, in which member states and the European Commission
were urged to ensure that freedom of demonstration – guaranteed by all human
rights treaties – is respected in practice.
At Pride London, Ms. Hands said: “We are shocked and
appalled to witness the violent scenes which unfolded in Riga this weekend.
As a member of the European Union, Latvia has a duty to protect its
citizens from discrimination and violent oppression.
“The ban on the Pride march by the Riga authorities in
the first place clearly shows that the forces of bigotry take precedence
over human rights in Latvia.
“The failure of the police to protect those taking part
from brutal homophobic vigilantes is a shameful betrayal of an oppressed
minority community,” she added.
Anders Dahlbeck, Amnesty International’s
researcher on Latvia, pointed out that the Latvian
authorities had breached their obligations under international law and
standards to respect the rights to freedom of assembly and expression by
banning the Riga Pride 2006 march.
“They have compounded this breach by failing to
adequately protect the participants in the other events organized by the
LGBT community,” he said.
“Why, after the Riga Pride 2006 march had been cancelled
due to perceived ‘security threats’ to the LGBT community, was so little
protection afforded during the events organized by the community on Saturday
22 July,” he asked?
Amnesty International maintains that the Latvian
authorities should also make clear that such violence is a criminal offence
and will not be tolerated. Specific directives and training should be given
to law enforcement officials on their duty to protect the human rights of
all individuals, regardless of their sexuality, and on how to identify and
investigate homophobic crimes, AI says.